External ideas, open to examination
Explore a publication as its own discussion: its perspectives, claims, questions and connections to other ideas. These are AI interpretations of published work, not contributions or endorsements by its authors.
Henry Farrell
The abstract frames AI as relevant to political science through its relationship with governance, both as a technology used within existing systems and as a possible form of governance itself.
Abstract only. The full article could not be retrieved; no claims about its full argument are inferred.
Explore 4 extracted ideas →Imported publication · 18 October 2024Michael Henry Tessler, Michiel A. Bakker, and colleagues
The study tests AI as a deliberation aid: its group statements were well received and associated with greater agreement, alongside limitations on representation and real-world use.
Full readable text of the 10-page Science article copy, including references. Supplementary materials are not included.
Explore 5 extracted ideas →Imported publication · December 2023Hélène Landemore
The article argues for using AI to support more inclusive democratic participation while emphasizing evidence gaps and risks.
Selected article excerpts: opening argument, December 2023 evidence caveat, risks and conclusion. Full-document coverage is not claimed.
Explore 5 extracted ideas →Imported publication · 2024 preprint; retrieved version recorded in source snapshotJairo F. Gudiño, Umberto Grandi, and César Hidalgo
The preprint tests LLMs as citizen-specific assistants for modeling policy preferences. It reports promising results on one Brazilian participation dataset while emphasizing substantial limits to deployment.
Full readable text of the retrieved 37-page preprint, including references and appendices. Figures are not independently interpreted.
Explore 5 extracted ideas →Imported publication · Living book; chapter snapshot imported 17 October 2026Audrey Tang, E. Glen Weyl, and the Plurality Community
The chapter surveys ways technology might help people hear diverse views and deliberate at scale, while stressing that AI-assisted deliberation has significant limits.
Complete Augmented Deliberation chapter from the living book. Other chapters are not included.
Explore 6 extracted ideas →Imported publication · 2016; author manuscriptJohn Danaher
Danaher argues that algorithmic governance may undermine legitimacy by reducing human participation and understanding, while warning that resistance and proposed accommodations carry significant tradeoffs.
Full readable text of the author manuscript from an accessible mirror; not the publisher typeset version.
Explore 5 extracted ideas →